Advice. People have been giving and receiving advice ever
since the first human beings arose on this earth. There are people more than willing
to offer their opinions on a host of topics regarding what one should think and
do, and others more than happy to receive said opinions. They can be opinions
on major life decisions, or a simple task now in process over the next five
minutes, and everything in between.
Structurally, there are two sources of advice available to
us: “Institutional Advice,” and “Individual Advice.” Institutional Advice comes
from three principal providers: Government, though its constitutions, laws and
regulations; Religion/Church, through its formal dogma, rituals, and sacred writings;
and Culture/Society, through its codes of acceptable conduct within one’s
group. We may not think of these institutions as true “advice givers,” but
rather as the necessary and acceptable mechanisms for holding group societies
together. But given that – for better or worse – humans can accept or deny
these various institutional rules, and decide whether to follow them or not
regardless of any societal punishments, then realistically all of these
institutional expectations are ultimately simply advice from which we make our life
choices.
Then there are the more familiar Individual Advice Givers. They
are the friends, family, sometimes even strangers who give us their perspective
on some issue or activity with which we are engaged. The fundamental goal is to
help the Advice Receiver find from within him-/herself the solutions and
decisions appropriate to him/her; it is all about Self-discovery. When done
well and with purity of intention, such advice can be very helpful to us as we
plod our way through our daily lives. For the Advice Giver, it can be personally
satisfying that one’s experiences and opinions have some value worth sharing,
and satisfying to know that one has been helpful to another human being. For
the Advice Receiver, the ability to share one’s burdens, and having the benefit
of wider experiences from which to draw, can ease the burden of one’s personal decision-making.
But when done poorly and with impurity of intention by either party, advice can
make our already complicated and difficult life even more problematic; a
potential gift from the emergence of one’s latent creativity may be forever
lost. There are four key scenarios that disrupt well-intentioned and effective giving
and receiving of advice, and can in fact create personal friction in the
relationship between Giver and Receiver.
1. Receiver: “What would you do [in this situation or
problem]?” What I would do if facing your challenges is speculation on my part,
because I am not actually facing your very real challenges in your very real
circumstances. So my imagined solutions would be theoretical at best. My
desired outcomes are not necessarily appropriate to your aspirations. The real
question is, what are you trying to accomplish? What I think I might do is
irrelevant to your decision-making, other than perhaps illustrating some
options that you might consider for yourself.
2. Receiver: “What would you do if you were me?” or Giver:
“If I were you I would …”: I am not you. My life experiences, goals,
priorities, and circumstances are different than yours. My current situation
may have similarities with yours, but overall our lives are significantly different.
Without strong restraint, I will wind up describing what I would do for ME, not
you. The best I can do in this scenario is to surround my reply with full
disclosure of how I reached that conclusion for me. Thereby, you can determine
whether my decision considerations and objectives have any relevance to your
aspirations and concerns.
3. Receiver: “What should I do?” I do not know. I cannot
possibly know. What I do know is that this question turns the conversation on
its head. It effectively allows the Receiver to surrender control and
responsibility for making his/her own personal decisions. We each have to make
our own call in response to the challenges we encounter. We each need to take
advantage of the opportunities for personal growth, maturity, and learning that
come with making and assessing our decisions. As tempting as it may be in the
moment, those opportunities are lost when the Receiver avoids the decision and
leaves it to others to determine instead.
4. Giver: “You should ...” The two killer words in any
advice discussion. Nothing of real value comes from any words that follow after.
The Giver has moved from a position of “helper” to one of control, of dominance
over the Receiver. In turn, the Receiver has moved either into a position of
subservience towards “going along with the should,” or defensiveness in order
to retain the integrity of his/her Self. This is no longer a conversation, but
a lecture. It is not to be mistaken for advice, but rather a treat for the ego
of the Giver.
There is one check that is helpful to measure whether our
intention as an Advice Giver is in its proper place. When we give advice, it is
critically important that we detach ourselves from the advice itself. That we
retain no sense of expectation or judgment as to whether the Receiver takes our
advice or not. We were asked for our thoughts and opinion. We gave same. If we
take personally the Receiver’s ultimate decision, and are miffed if s/he goes
another direction, then we know that we actually attempted to make the
conversation about us, not the Receiver. The goal was for us to be humbly helpful
to another in their struggle by finding where their heart and mind are leading
them. It was not supposed to be about our own wonderfulness, the superiority of
our knowledge and supposed wisdom, and our life instead of theirs.
Which brings us to the final overriding and cautionary axiom
for Advice Givers: THE WORST ADVICE THERE
IS, IS UNSOLICITED ADVICE. Advice giving is a response function, not a self-initiated
function. Sometimes the best advice is to say nothing at all, but to just
listen; minding our own business can often be the best advice we can offer. Often,
what people really want is just to be heard. If our egos really call us to
offer advice not requested, then we would do well to at least first ask the permission
of the Receiver as to whether s/he wants it.
This is my unsolicited Advice Regarding Advice.
(With thanks to a special meditation group for stimulating
this essay.)
© 2021
Randy Bell https://OurSpiritualWay.blogspot.com